RISK ASSESSMENT OF SUICIDE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Amresh Shrivastava1*, Avinash Desousa2, Robbie Campbell3
Affiliation
- 1Associate Professor of Psychiatry, and Consultant psychiatrist, Ambulatory care program Parkwood Institute, Mental health & Associate Scientist, Lawson Health Research Institute, The Western University, London Ontario, Canada
- 2Senior Research Associate, LTMG Hospital and Medical College Mumbai, & Mental health resource foundation, Mumbai, India
- 3Professor Emeritus Parkwood Institute, Mental health The Western University, London Ontario, Canada
Corresponding Author
Amresh Shrivastava, Parkwood Institute, Mental health, 550 Wellington Road, London, ON N6C 0A7, Tel: (519) 646-6100; E-mail: dr.amresh@gmail.com
Citation
Shrivastava, A., et al. Risk Assessment of Suicide in Clinical Practice. (2015) J Addict Depend 2(4): 1- 5.
Copy rights
© 2016 Shrivastava, A. This is an Open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Keywords
Abstract
Suicide is a global public health problem. Its management in clinical practice is complex and challenging .Studies show about 26% suicide in mental health system. Out of these, 14% commit suicide during hospital stay; about 50 - 90% have at least one psychiatric diagnosis. 60 - 70% of patients are hospitalized due to an attempt or potential crisis, about 15 - 20% attempt suicide prior to admission. Suicide is also common in post-discharge period. Every psychiatrist on an average loses atleast on client due to suicide in an average span of 20 years of practice. In about 70% of cases, suicide behavior is there as on for hospitalization in acute settings. Continuous training and skill development are two of the most important measures in clinical practice for dealing with suicide behavior. High suicide rates are reported in prodromal stage, acute illness, post-hospitalization and soon after discharge in the community. A clinician faces challenging situations while determining the level of care and referral for a patient with a high suicide potential. There is continued struggle amongst clinicians for decision- making in regards to the need for hospitalization, level of monitoring, voluntary status, and time of discharge. It is generally agreed that suicide is difficult to predict and prevent; however, in order to develop clinical excellence and offer a standard of care, continued education and knowledge translation for bringing research into practice is the least that can be done. Inspite of this need, continued education for mental health professionals and psychiatrists in-training remains limited.