Child Abuse and Neglect: Living with or without Parents
Shazia Hasan
Affiliation
1Uzma Ali, Professor, Institute of Clinical Psychology, University of Karachi
2Shazia Hasan, Associate Professor, University of central Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
Corresponding Author
Uzma Ali, Professor, Institute of Clinical Psychology, University of Karachi, Email: uzma_kamranali@yahoo.com
Citation
Uzma, A., et al. Child Abuse and Neglect: Living with or without Parents (2018) Ommega J Pediatr 2(1): 1- 5.
Copy rights
© 2018 Uzma, A. This is an Open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Objective of the present study is to find out the incidence of child emotional, physical and sexual abuse in children living in foster homes and children living with their parents. Based on the literature review following research questions were formulated 1) History of child abuse would likely to be reported more often in children living in foster homes as compared to (control group) children living with their biological parents. 2) What type of abuse is mostly experienced by children living in foster homes. 3) How often neglect is experienced by children living in foster homes and children living with their families. Initial sample was comprised of 395 children with the age range between 6 to 12 years (mean age = 9. 5 years SD = 1. 97) 282 children living in foster homes and 113 children living in homes with their biological parents in Karachi- PakistanA demographic form, Checklist for Child Abuse Evaluation (Joseph, 2005). Descriptive statistical analysis was used for the frequency of the abuse and neglect reported.
Introduction
Abuse either emotional, psychological, neglect or physical can shatter and/or devastate an individual personality. Emotional and psychological disorders due to abuse and neglect are depression, posttraumatic disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, anger and dissociative disorders[1] (Carnes, 2007). Abuse or neglect are traumatic experiences and can have a deep effect on children’s brain development. When a child experiences or witnesses the threat from his/her environment resulting in physical harm or injury is called traum[2]. Post traumatic stress disorder was reported more in veterans who had a history of childhood physical abuse[3].
There is evidence about the childhood maltreatment and cognitive, behavioral and adaptation failures and psychopathology, in later childhood and adulthood[3,4] Moreover a study by[5] discussed that 80% of adolescent with abuse history met diagnostic criteria for one psychiatric disorder at age 21. Many other problems including suicidal attempts, depression, and anxiety were also reported in this study.
Various studies report high rates of abuse in foster care living, for instance nearly half of all children in foster care reported to have chronic medical problems. 8% of all children in foster care have serious emotional problems, 11% of children exiting foster care aged out of the system, in 2011[6]. Children in foster care experience high rates of child abuse, emotional deprivation, and physical neglect. In one study in the United Kingdom” foster children were 7 – 8 times, and children in residential care 6 times more likely to be assessed by a pediatrician for abuse than a child in the general population[7]. A study of foster children in Oregon and Washington State found that nearly one third reported being abused by a foster parent or another adult in a foster home[8]. These statistics do not speak to the situation these children are coming from, but it does show the very large problem of child-on-child sexual abuse within the system. A study on orphan children showed that they had low self esteem and confidence and felt more needy and isolated as they were deprived of love, play, shelter, food and resources to live. Additionally they were also more often forced for sex abuse[9].
Egeland and Erickson[10] did a long-term study of children whose mothers were unavailable or neglectful. The results of the study discussed that neglected children were found to be socially withdrawn, inattentive and cognitively underachieving in their elementary school years. Child abuse has long term effects as an association has been found in childhood physical and sexual abuse and adult psychopathology in psychiatrist patient[11].
A higher incidence of post - traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Vietnam veterans has been shown to be associated with a history of childhood physical abuse[2]. Similarly[12] have shown that early trauma predisposes adults to suffer PTSD following traumatic event experiences in adulthood.
The high rates of mental health problems in homeless children indicate that the most vulnerable are those who suffer the most. High rates of Physical and sexual abuse by parents or guardians were concluded from this study. Improved community mental health services may prevent some from becoming homeless[13]. In a subsequent cohort, mental health problems among both children and their mothers were strongly associated with a poor family and social support networks[14]. The high rates of mental health problems in these homeless children therefore indicate the need for broadly based psychosocial intervention in dealing with these problems and improving the accessibility and availability of community mental health services for them. The high prevalence of substance abuse also demands intensive, active treatment programs along with long-term support and rehabilitation programs. It may help to revert to more stable and healthy living conditions.
After reviewing the literature, the main objective is to investigate that a history of child abuse would likely lead to psychopathology in homeless children. This research will be helpful in developing awareness and intervention programs in the context of our culture.
Research Questions
History of child abuse would likely to be reported more often in children living in foster homes as compared to (control group) children living with their biological parents.
What type of abuse is mostly experienced by children living in foster homes.
How often neglect is experienced by children living in foster homes and children living with their families
Methods
Participants: Initial sample was comprised of 395 children with the age range between 6 to 12 years (mean age = 9. 5 years SD = 1. 97) 282 children living in foster homes and 113 children living in homes with their biological parents in Karachi- Pakistan.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: In this study Orphan children are those whose children were left alone in a shelter home either their father were dying or their parents were not known since after birth for example at Ethic homes (welfare organization in Pakistan) people left one –two day child at the door. This organization gives shelter and all rearing facilities to these children. In current study these children were categorized as orphans. Another category where child knew that his or her father or both parents were died.
Abundant children are those whose were left at shelter homes by their care taker at home (including parents, step parents, grandparents or any other relatives) due to unavailable resources to rear, educate or protect the child. This also includes those whose children were leaving their homes due to some reasons (most abuse as reported by child) and they were caught by police or different welfare organizations, and now they do not want to go back to their homes or their care taker reluctant to take their responsibility.
Control group comprised of those children who were living with their biological parents at their homes they all belongs to lower socioeconomic.
In all three groups only those children were included in the studies who were studying in school, permanent or temporary bases.
Children having any mental or physical disability were not included in the study.
Description of Measures
A demographic form, Checklist for Child Abuse Evaluation[2]and Devereux Scales of Mental Disorders[8] were selected for investigation of the studied variables. A short description of the scale is given below.
A demographic form: A self developed demographic form comprised of items that focus on gathering information regarding, name (optional), age, gender, educational level, residence or institution, duration of institutionalization (if known), parents’ status ( alive/dead , separated/divorced/joint), no. of sibling (if known) etc.
Checklist for Child Abuse Evaluation[2]
In order to investigate and evaluate children and adolescents who have been abused or neglected, a Checklist for Child Abuse Evaluation (CCAE) was used. The CCAE consists of 264-item with 24 sections.
Scoring: Scoring of this checklist was done in yes or no format. If the child reported the abuse of any type. Researcher counted as it YES and if he/she did not indicate any type of abuse. Researcher counted it as NO. Then the frequencies of four types of abuse in the categories of Yes and No were calculated.
Results
Table 1: Descriptive statistics of the Demographic variables.
Group | N | M | SD |
---|---|---|---|
Age: | |||
Orphan Children | 105 | 9.73 | 1.907 |
Abundant Children | 177 | 9.69 | 1.91 |
Control group | 113 | 9.19 | 2.09 |
Total | 395 | 9.56 | 1.97 |
Table 1 (b): Educational level of entire sample
Educational level: | N | M |
---|---|---|
Orphan Children | 105 | 2 grade |
Abundant Children | 177 | 2 grade |
Control group | 113 | 3 grade |
Total | 395 | 2 grade |
Table 2: Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) of child abuse (Emotional abuse, Physical abuse, Sexual abuse and Neglect) reported during the Interview of Child abuse Checklist.
Type of Abuse | N | F | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
In three group | Yes | No | Yes | No | Total |
i). Orphan Children 105 | |||||
a) Emotional Abuse | 51 | 54 | 51.42 | 48.57 | 100 |
b) Physical Abuse | 47 | 58 | 44.76 | 55.23 | 100 |
c) Sexual abuse | 2 | 103 | 1.9 | 98.95 | 100 |
d) Neglect | 60 | 45 | 57.12 | 42.85 | 100 |
ii) Abundant Children 177 | |||||
a) Emotional Abuse | 115 | 62 | 64.9 | 35.02 | 100 |
b) Physical Abuse | 104 | 73 | 58.75 | 41.24 | 100 |
c) Sexual abuse | 8 | 169 | 4.51 | 95.45 | 100 |
d) Neglect | 108 | 69 | 61.01 | 38.98 | 100 |
iii) Control group 113 | |||||
a) Emotional Abuse | 49 | 64 | 43.36 | 56.63 | 100 |
b) Physical Abuse | 80 | 33 | 70.79 | 29.2 | 100 |
c) Sexual abuse | 4 | 109 | 3.5 | 96.46 | 100 |
d) Neglect | 41 | 72 | 36.28 | 63.71 | 100 |
Total | 395 |
Table 1 and Table 2 shows that Emotional abuse was more frequently reported in abundant children (64.9%) than orphan (51.42%) and control group ( 43.36); physical abuse was more frequently reported in control group (70.79%), than abundant children (58.74%) and orphan children (54.76%); Sexual abuse was the least reported in all three group abundant (4.5%), control group (3.5%) and orphan (1.9% ) and Neglect was also frequently reported in abundant children (61.01%), orphan (57.12%) and control group (36.28%).
Findings of this research showed that Emotional abuse was more frequently reported in abundant children (64.9%) than orphan (51.42%) and control group ( 43.36); physical abuse was more frequently reported in control group (70.79%), than abundant children (58.74%) and orphan children (54.76%); Neglect was also frequently reported in abundant children (61.01%), orphan (57.12%) and control group (36.28%) while Sexual abuse was the least reported in all three group abundant (4.5%), control group (3.5%) and orphan (1.9% ) (Table 2).
The reason for the low frequency of sexual abuse could be the hesitation or shyness of the children to discuss about this issue. In our culture discussion on this topic is considered as tabooed and prohibited. Moreover children might have feared that if they talked about the matter, they might be accused by other. Recently[15] studied the vulnerability to abuse and neglect in orphan children and youth living in Sub -Saharan African living in extended families by utilizing the qualitative research design. They reported that these studies of different countries showed similar form of abuse and neglect such as discrimination in intra-house hold experiences, very basic right of the orphan that is educational neglect, deprived them from material, child labor and of course sexual and physical abuse. The perceived risk factors in this study were found to be poverty, living with a non-biological caregiver, stigma and alcohol abuse.
Recently Sabin, MEcon, Brooks, and[16] conducted a research on orphan children and presented their poster in an International Conference and showed that in the abuse and exploitation sub-domain, all children were rated as “good” or “fair” by the Child Status Index (CSI), but among surveyed children aged 11 - 17, 20% or more reported being beaten, kicked, being locked out of the house, threatened with abandonment, cursed, and made to feel ashamed.
Previous researches has established the association of child abuse with mental health for instance More over previously[17] in their study showed the impact of child abuse on mental health and they found that both male and female victims of abuse had significantly higher rates of psychiatric treatment during the study period than general population controls (12.4% v. 3.6%). Rates were higher for childhood mental disorders, personality disorders, anxiety disorders and major affective disorders, but not for schizophrenia. Male victims were significantly more likely to have had treatment than females (22.8% v.10.2%). Similar findings revealed in our study that boys score higher on the variable of Inattention (orphan and abundant /homeless children), (table 25) autism (table 27) and male abundant children also score higher on acute problem. While, comparing male and female score difference on Internalizing and externalizing behavior disorder, there found no significant difference among orphan and abundant children. However, boys of control group score higher on the variable of externalizing disorders. As mentioned above physical abuse is frequently reported in the control group. During the interview it was observed that these children belonged to the lower socioeconomic class. Previously[18] using a cross-sectional unmatched case control design to compare emotional and behavioral problems of 420 primary school-going orphans and non-orphans. They reported that both orphans and non-orphans had high levels of psychological distress as measured using Rutter’s questionnaire but the difference was non-significant. There were no major psychiatric disorders such as psychosis, major affective or organic mental syndromes among both groups. They found that psychological distress was associated with poor academic performance (p = 0. 00) in both groups however, more orphans than non-orphans had more common emotional and behavioral problems, e.g., more orphans reported finding “life unfair and difficult” ; 8.3% orphans compared to 5.1% of the non-orphans reported having had past suicidal thoughts and more reported past “forced sex / abuse” .
Social functioning of orphans was reported to be poorer than non orphans which are very important factors for their mental health, for instance orphans were more often described as “needy, sensitive, isolative with low confidence and reported to have lower self-esteem. They often lacked love, protection, identity, security, play, food and shelter.” Most lived in poor families with few resources, faced stigma and were frequently relocated. Community resources were also inadequate in these families[19].
Conclusion
It is concluded that orphan and abundant children are more at risk for child abuse. Mal treatment like emotional and physical abuse and neglect were frequently reported. Sexual abuse, though not reported frequently might be due to the fear of stigmatization but it was observed that this could also be present, which should be investigated in further research. Since emotional problems were revealed in orphan and abundant children, psychological counseling and psychotherapy should be provided and measures should be taken to improve their quality of life by government agencies or international organizations.
Limitations and recommendations
This study was conducted on a larger sample, data collection was very difficult as children were selected from shelter homes of Karachi, and scales were too lengthy which took a lot of time to administer. Further the scale was comprised of interview forms; both researchers themselves with help of students of psychology collected the data to get valid findings. To make research cost effective it is strongly recommended that scales with fewer items should be developed in Pakistan, so that it can be utilized in researches.
For control group researcher had to visit families in their homes in different areas of Karachi, as one scale was administered on a child and one on caretaker, it took a lot of time and created difficulties. Home visits were planned for control group because in Pakistan children belongs to lower socioeconomic status and study in small primary or government schools in their neighbors, from where it was very difficult to collect data from mothers and their children. According to researchers such as[9] also suggested that Child Guidance Counselors in schools/shelter homes should be provided and social skill training should be given to them.
It is strongly recommended that awareness programs, seminars and workshops about psychological health among disadvantaged groups should be conducted. The government should make policies to provide facilities to increase the quality of life among orphan and abundant children. Child abuse is frequently reported in children living in shelter home, organization and government agencies should focus more on child abuse prevention and protection.
References
- 1. De Bellis, M.,Thomas, L. Biologic findings of post-traumatic stress disorder and child maltreatment. (2003) Curr Psychiatry Rep 5(2): 108-117.
- 2. Pynoos, R. S., Fairbank, J. A., Steinberg, A. M., et al. The National Child Traumatic Stress Network: Collaborating to improve the standard of care. (2008) Professional Psyc 39 (4): 389-395.
- 3. Bremner, J. D., Southwick, S. M., Johnson, D. R., et al. Childhood physical abuse and combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder in Vietnam veterans. (1993) Am J Psychiatry150(2): 235-239.
- 4. Cicchetti, D., Toth, S.L. A developmental psychopathology perspective on child abuse and neglect. . (1995) J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 34(5): 541-565.
- 5. Silverman, A. B., Reinherz, H. Z., Giaconia, R.M. The long-term sequelae of child and adolescent abuse: a longitudinal community study. (1996) Child Abuse and Negl 20(8): 709-723.
- 6. Foster Care Foacts and Statistics”. (2013) FCAA.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 7. Hobbs, G. F., Hobbs, C. J., Wynne, J. M. Abuse of children in foster and residential care. (1999) Child abuse negl, 23(12): 1239–1252.
- 8. Peter, J.P. “Improving Family Foster Care | Casey Family Programs”. (2011) Casey.org.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 9. Musisi, S., Kinyanda, E., Nakasujja, N., et al. A comparison of the behavioral and emotional disorders of primary school-going orphans and non-orphans in Uganda. (2007) Afr Health Sci. 7(4): 202-213.
- 10. Egeland, B., Erickson, M. F. Psychologically unavailable caregiving: The effects on development of young children and the implications for intervention. (1987) Psychological maltreatment of children and youth 110-120.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 11. Swett, C., Surreg, J., Cohen, C. Sexual and Physical abuse histories and psychiatric symptoms among male psychiatric out patients. (1990) American Journal of Psychiatry147 (5): 632-636.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 12. Yehuda, R., Kahana, B., Schmeidler, J., et al. Impact of cumulative lifetime trauma and recent stress on current posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in Holocaust survivors. (1995) Am J Psychiatry 152(2): 1815-1818.
- 13. Farber, E.D., Mcload, D., Kinast, C et al. Violence in families of adolescent runaways. (1984) Child Abuse Negl 8(3): 295-299.
- 14. Vostanis, P., Tischler, V., Cumella, S., et al Mental health problems and social supports among homeless mothers and children victims of domestic and community violence. (2001) Int J Soc Psychiatry 47(4): 30-40.
- 15. Morantz, G., Cole, D., Vreeman, R., et al. Child abuse and neglect among orphaned children and youth living in extended families in sub-Saharan Africa: What have we learned from qualitative inquiry? (2013) Vulnerable Child Youth Stud 8(4): 338-352.
- 16. Kyoung-Sae, N., Bahn, Song, J., et al. The influence of unsupervised time on elementary school children at high risk for inattention and problem behaviors. (2013) Child Abuse Neg 38(6): 1120-1127.
Pubmed|| Crossref|| Others
- 17. Sabin, L., Brooks, M.I., Miller, C. et al. Measuring vulnerability among orphans and vulnerable children in rural Malawi: validation study of the Child Status Index tool. (2011). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 58(1): 1-10.
- 18. Post, R., Weiss, S., Leverich, G. Recurrent affective disorder: Roots in developmental neurobiology and illness progression based on changes in gene expression. (1994) Dev Psycho 6(4): 781-813.
- 19. Spataro, J., Mullen, P.E., Burgess, P.M., et al. Impact of child sexual abuse on mental health Prospective study in males and females. (2004) Br J Psychiatry 184: 416-421.