Cladribine in the Treatment of Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, where do we stand?

Marlies Van Hoef; Marlies Van Hoef; Ommega Internationals

Review

Publish Date : 2019-03-12

International Journal of Hematology and Therapy

Cladribine in the Treatment of Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, where do we stand?

Marlies Van Hoef
Marlies Van Hoef

Article information

Affiliation

Van Hoef Consulting.

Corresponding Author

Marlies Van Hoef, MD, PhD, MBA, Van Hoef Consulting. Tel: 0041-31-530; Email: vanhoef@vanhoefconsulting.com

Citation

Marlies, V.H. Cladribine in the Treatment of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia, where do we Stand? (2019) Int J Hemat Ther 5(1):

Copy rights

Keywords

Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia; Cladribine; Combination treatment; Ibrutinib review

Abstract

Waldenström macroglobulemia is a rare disease for which treatment with cladribine (2-chorodeoxyadenosine) has been reported since 1993. Cladribine has meanwhile been administered to several hundreds of reported patients either as monotherapy or in combination therapy and is available for intravenous and subcutaneous administration. Cladribine has been used in treatment naive and previously pretreated patients. Literature describing the use of cladribine, combinations of other medications and ibrutinib in Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia is reviewed herein.

Introduction

Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare indolent B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by the accumulation of monoclonal cells in the bone marrow and peripheral lymphoid tissues, and associated with the production of serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal protein. The age-adjusted annual incidence rate is 3.4 per million in men and 1.7 per million in women in the United States and 7.3 and 4.2 per million respectively in Europe[1,2]. The disease accounts for approximately 1% to 2% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The main clinical symptoms arecytopenia, hyperviscosity syndrome, epistaxis, constitutional symptoms, lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegali. The diagnosis is confirmed by the presence of IgM monoclonal protein in the serum and a bone marrow biopsy showing > 10% clonal lymphoplasmacytic cells. Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) is a purine nucleoside analog that was developed in the 1970s. It was first tested in humans in the early 1980s. Cladribine is a chemotherapeutic compound that can be administered intravenously or subcutaneously. It is a prodrug that is activated after uptake in cells[3]. It functions as an antimetabolite and is toxic in hematopoietic cells and leukemic and lymphatic malignancies, but has little or no effect in non-hematopoietic tissues and solid tumors. It is polyvalent and is toxic for dividing and quiescent cells[3]. Cladribine induces myelosuppression and immunosuppression. A review of its efficacy in WM is described in this paper.

Review

Table 1 displays studies with cladribine for symptomatic WM that have been reported chronologically over time.

Table 1: Cladribine in patients with WM

Author	Pretreatment	Treatment	Patients	ORR	PFS	OS	Commend
4)Dimopoulos MA	Pretreated 20 Untreated 9	Cladribineiv 2 cycles	29, median age 65y	ORR 17 (59%) 100% untreated 40% pretreated	At 7m follow-up 1 responding pat had relapsed	At 7m OS 89.7%
5)Dimopoulos MA	Pretreated 53 Untreated 15	Fludarabine (28) Cladribine iv (40) median 5 cycles	68	ORR 35 (51.5%) 4 CR ORR cladribine untreated 92% pretreated 48%	At 18m follow-up in untreated pat 86.7%. Med DOR in pretreated pat 38m.	At 18m OS in untreated pat 100%. Med OS in pretreated pat 43m.	At analysis 2 of 15 untreated patients had relapsed
6)Zaucha JM	Untreated 1	Cladribine iv	1, aged 68y	ORR 1 (100%) 1 PR
7)Dimopoulos MA	Pretreated Fludarabine 14	Cladribine iv 2 cycles	14	ORR 4 (28.6%) 4 PR
8)Delannoy A	Pretreated 13 Untreated 5	Cladribine iv median 2 cycles	18, median age 69y	ORR 7 (38.8%) 7 PR
9)Dimopoulos MA	Untreated 26	Cladribine iv 2 cycles	26	ORR 22 (85%) 3 CR, 19 PR	At 13m follow-up 5 pat had relapsed	At 13m OS 81%	Pat retreated after relapse had again response
10)Dimopoulos MA	Pretreated 46	Cladribine iv 2 cycles	46	ORR 20 (43%)	Median 12 months	Median 28 months	Response dependendent on disease state
11)Richards AI, J	Untreated 1	Cladribine iv 4 cycles	1, meningeal involvement	1 CR (100%)	DFS 15+ m
12)Fridrik MA	Untreated 10	Cladribine iv 4 cycles	10, median age 62.3y	ORR 100%, 1 CR, 8 PR, 1 MR	At median 57w 70%	At median 57w 90%
13)Betticher DC	Pretreated except for 1 pat	Cladribinesc max 6 cycles	25, median age 65y	ORR 68% incl. dis. Stabilization 10 PR (40%)	Med DOR 8m
14)Liu ES	Untreated 7 Pretreated 18	Cladribine iv 3 cycles with continuation if PR achieved	20, median age 66y	ORR 55%, 1 CR, 10 PR		At 20m 85%	57% untreated and 54% pretreated responded
15)Hellmann A	Untreated 9 Pretreated 13	Cladribine iv 4 cycles	22, median age 62y	ORR 41% 1 CR, 8 PR, 10 stabilization	Mean DOR in responders 12m		Response 38% in pretreated, 44% in untreated
16)Lewandowski	Untreated 11 Pretreated 14	Cladribine iv, mean 3 cycles	25, mean age 63y	ORR 64% 1 CR, 15 PR			Six patients obtained stable disease
17)Weber DM	Untreated 94	Cladribine iv vs Clad iv + Pred vs Clad sc + Cyclo vs Clad sc + CycloRitux 2 cycles	16, med age 67y 20, med age 61y 17, med age 62y 9, med age 63y	ORR 94%, 3 CR ORR 60%, 1 CR ORR 84%, 2 CR ORR 94%, 3, CR	Med DOR 23 m Med DOR 9 m Med DOR 36 m DOR NR at med 21m	Median 73 m Median 41 m Not reached Not reached	2^nd line ORR 80% 2^nd line ORR 88% 2^nd line ORR 77%
18)Laszlo D	Untreated 16 Pretreated 13	Cladribinesc +Rituximab 4 cycles	29, median age 64y	ORR 89.6%, 7CR, 16 PR, 3 MR	At 43m FU 4 patients relapsed		No difference in response pretreated and untreated

ORR=overall response rate, PFS=progression free survival, DFS=disease free survival, OS=overall survival, CR=complete response, PR=partial response, MR=minor response, DOR=duration of response, iv=intravenous, sc=subcutaneous, Clad= cladribine, Pred= prednisone, Cyclo= cyclophosphamide, CycloRitux= cyclophosphamide, rituximab, m=months, FU=follow-up

In the initial reports cladribine was administered as monotherapy for two to five cycles intravenously and up to six cycles subcutaneously[4-16]. In studies at later date cladribine was administered in combination treatment[17,18]. Cladribine two to four cycles induced overall response rates from 85% to 100% in treatment naïve patients[4-17]. Among responders were complete response[9-18]. Overall response rates were lower in studies that combined treatment naive and pretreated patients and varied from 28.6% to 89.6%[4-18]. The variation may depend on number of prior treatments and the percentage of untreated patients in the cohort. Dimopoulos et al. found an overall response rate of 92% to 100% in untreated and 40% to 48% in pretreated patients with two cycles of cladribine[4,5]. In a study reporting cladribine, with cladribine plus prednisone, cladribine plus cyclophosphamide, or cladribine plus cyclophosphamide plus rituximab in treatment naïve patients, response rates with two cycles of cladribine monotherapy (94%) were comparable with those with the two latter combinations (84% and 94%) respectively and higher than those when cladribine was combined with prednisone (60%)[17]. In this study retreatment with cladribine in second line resulted in response rates of 77% to 88%. Successful retreatment after relapse had already previously been reported[9]. Duration of response and progression free survival was longer for treatment naive than for pretreated patients. In treatment naïve patients response duration was in general longer when cladribine was used in combination than when cladribine was used as monotherapy, but the number of cycles administered may also have influenced the response duration . Weber et al. reported median response durations of 23 months, 9 months, 36 months and not reached at median 21 months with respectively cladribine, cladribine plus prednisone, cladribine plus cyclophosphamide and cladribine plus cyclophosphamide plus rituximab in treatment naïve patients who received two cycles[17]. Ten of fifteen patients responding to cladribine, eight of twelve responding to cladribine and prednisone, and thirteen of thirty one responding to cladribine plus cyclophosphamide were retreated with the same therapy after relapse[17]. The duration of second remission was similar to the first remission, being 24, 14 and 30 months respectively. Laszlo et al. reported a response rate of 79.7% in treatment naïve and pretreated patients who received subcutaneous cladribine and rituximab[18]. At 43 months follow-up relapse free survival was 84.6 % in patients who had responded to four cycles of the combination of cladribine and rituximab. Durations of response or progression free survival in studies with cladribine monotherapy including treatment naïve and pretreated patients were shorter than in studies including treatment naïve patients only, Cladribine was in general administered intravenously but subcutaneous administration was also reported . In the various studies cladribine intravenously was given at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg/d continuously for 7 days or at a dose of 0.12 to 0.14 mg / kg / d or 4 to 5.6 mg/m2/d over two hours for five days. Subcutaneous injection occurred at a dose of 0.1 mg / kg / d for five days either as monotherapy or in combination therapy. Subcutaneous and intravenous administration are equally efficient but subcutaneous administration is more convenient and cost-saving[19,20].

Various treatments for WM other than cladribine have been reported in studies that included patients with treatment naïve symptomatic WM:

Table 2 displays regimens that have been reported in treatment naïve patients. Dexamethasone plus rituximab plus cyclophosphamide induced overall response rates of 83% to 96% in treatment naïve patients[21-23]. Median progression free survival exceeded two years and was 34 to 35 months[21-23]. Castillo et al. reported three different combination treatments including rituximab and rituximab maintenance and observed a major response rate of 97% in treatment naïve patients compared to 68% in patients who received no maintenance[24]. Progression free survival was median 6.8 years with and 2.8 years without rituximab maintenance and overall survival 84% with and 66% without rituximab maintenance[24]. Half-dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubine, vincristine, prednisone plus rituximab (CHOP-R) induced an overall response of 65% and a progression free survival at two years of 70% in treatment naïve patients[25]. Three bortezomib plus rituximab containing treatment regimens induced overall response rates of 85% to 96% in treatment naïve patients[26-28]. This combination resulted in an event free survival of 79% at one year[28]; when dexamethasone was added median progression free survival was 42 months and with rituximab maintenance progression free survival at 22.8 months was 78.3 % (26,28). Carfilzomib, rituximab plus dexamethasone with same maintenance regimen resulted in 87.1% overall response rate, and at 15.4 months progression free survival in 64.5% of patients naive to bortezomib and rituximab[29]. Ibrutinib induced 100 % overall response in 30 treatment naïve patients[30]. At 14.6 months follow-up 6.7 % of patients had relapsed. The effect of continuous (maintenance) treatment with ibrutinib became apparent in a study reported by Gustine at al., who reported an IgM rebound 4 weeks after discontinuation of ibrutinib[31].

Table 2: Studies with other medications that included treatment naive WM patients

Author	Pretreatment	Treatment	Patients	ORR	PFS/DFS	OS	Commend
21.Dimopoulos MA	untreated	DexaRituxCyclo 8 cycles	72	ORR 83% 7% CR, 67% PR, 9% MR	2y PFS 67% and for responders 80%	2y OS 90%	Median time to response 4.1m
22.Kastritis E	untreated	DexaRituxCyclo at 7y FU, retreatment upon relapse	72	ORR 83% 7% CR, 67% PR, 9% MR	Med PFS 35m	8y OS 64% 10y estimated OS 53%	Med PFS rituxalone 23m, rituxcombination 3y
23.Paludo J	50 untreated 50 rel/ref	DexaRituxCyclo	100	ORR 87% Untreated ORR 96%	Med PFS 32m Untreated med PFS 34m		Med TTNT 50m Untreated med TTNT NR
24.Castillo JJ	Untreated	DexaRituxCyclo DexaBortezoRituxBendaRitux maintenance Ritux vs no maintenance	38 87 57 116	Med TTBR 30m Med TTBR 20m Med TTBR 18m Major R 97% vs 68%	Med PFS 4.8y Med PFS 5.8y Med PFS 5.5y Med PFS 6.8y vs 2.8y	10y OS 81% 10y OS 96% 10y OS 95% 10y OS 84% vs 66%	Maintenance added ORR, PFS and OS
25.Sekiguchi N	Untreated	½ dose CHOP-R 6 cycles	20	ORR 13 (65%)	2y PFS 70%	2y OS 93.3%
26.Treon SP	Untreated	DexaBortezoRitux 4 cycles induction, 4 cycles mainten	23	ORR 96%, Major R 83%, 3 CR	At 22.8m PFS 78.3%		Responses after 1.4 months
27.Ghobrial IM	Untreated	BortezoRitux 4 cycles, Ritux in cycles 1 and 4	26	ORR 88% 1CR, 1 nCR, 15 PR, 6 MR	1y EFS 79%
28.Dimopoulos MA	Untreated	DexaBortezoRitux 5 cycles, with DexaRitux in c 2+5	59	ORR 85%, 3% CR, 7% VGPR 58% PR	Med PFS 42m 3y DOR 70%	3y OS 81%	Peripheral neuropathy in 46%
29.Treon SP	Naïve to Bortezo + Ritux	CarfilzoRituxDexa Maintenance same mainten 8 cycles	31	ORR 87.1% 1 CR, 10 VGPR, 10 PR, 6 MR	At 15.4m 20 pat progression free
30.Treon SP	Untreated	Ibrutinib	30	ORR 100%, Major R 83%	At 14.6 m FU, 2 pat progressed Estimated 18m PFS 92%		Wild type CXCR4 vs CXCR4 major r 94% vs 71%, VGPR 31% vs 7%
31.Gustine JN	Discontinuation of ibrutinib	Ibrutinib	189 51 discontinue	IgM rebound 4 wk after discon in 73%; ORR to salvage 71%		OS shorter if progressive on ibrutinib	Discontinuation at 12,24,36,48m 22%, 26%, 35%, 43%

ORR=overall response, PFS=progression free survival, DFS=disease free survival, EFS=event free survival, OS=overall survival, CR=complete response, nCR=near complete response, VGPR=very good partial response, PR=partial response, MR=minor response, major r=major response, DOR=duration of response, TTBR=time to best response, med=median, m=months, y=year, TTNT=time to new treatment, NR=not reached, FU=follow=up, rel/ref=relapsed/refractory, DexaRituxCyclo= dexamethasone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, DexaBortezoRitux= dexamethasone, bortezomib, rituximab, BendaRitux= bendamustin, rituximab, CHOP-R= cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, rituximab, CarfilzoRitux,Dexa =carfilzomib, rituximab, dexamethason

Various treatments for WM other than cladribine have been reported in studies that included symptomatic treatment naïve and relapsed and / or refractory patients:

Table 3 displays regimens that have been reported in such studies. Cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for four cycles induced overall response rates of 55% to 76% with a median progression free survival of 24 months and median duration of response of 38 months in treatment naïve and pretreated patients[32,33]. The overall response rate with four fludarabine based combinations was 90% and median progression free survival 43.1 months[34]. Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide plus rituximab for at least four cycles induced an overall response of 79% to 85.4% and at median 47 to 51 months median progression free survival was not reached[35-37]. In one report median event free survival was 77 months[36]. Pentostatin combined with cyclophosphamide with or without rituximab induced an overall response of 64.7% and maintenance rituximab prevented relapse in 58.8% of treatment naïve and pretreated patients[38]. The same regimen induced two years progression free survival in 83.7% and when this regimen was in addition used as maintenance the progression free survival increased to 91.7%[39]. Bendamustine plus rituximab induced response rates from 80.2% to 95% in pretreated patients[40-42]. Median progression free survival varied from 13.2 months to 58 months[40-42]. Dexamethasone, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide induced an overall response of 87% in treatment naïve and pretreated patients[24,43]. Median progression free survival was 32 months[23,42]. Cyclophamide, doxorubicine, vincristine, prednisone plus rituximab with rituximab maintenance in part of the patients induced a high overall response of 92.3% in treatment naïve and relapsed and refractory patients and at 9 months a progression free survival of 76.9%[43]. Two bortezomib plus rituximab based combination treatments induced an overall response of 81% and 89% in pretreated patients[44,45]. The median time to progression and was 15.6 months and the median progression free survival 21 months respectively[44,45]. Bortezomib monotherapy or bortezomib plus prednisone though induced lower response of 43.2% in advanced WM[46]. Dimopoulos et al. reported an overall response of 90%, with 71% major response with ibrutinib in rituximab refractory patients, who had received median four prior cycles[47]. Median progression free survival at 18 months was 86%. In another study including treatment naïve and pretreated patients ibrutinib plus rituximab induced an overall response of 92% with 72% major response[48].

Ibrutinib was administered continuously and at 30 months progression free survival was 82%[48].

Table 3: Studies with other medications that included treatment naive and pretreated patients with WM

Author	Pretreatment	Treatment	Patients	ORR	PFS/DFS	OS	Commend
32.Dimopoulos MA	7 refractory 2 relapsed 2 untreated	FludaCyclo 4 cycles	11, median age 73y	PR 6 (55%)	Med PFS 24m		At 28m FU, 2 of 6 responders progressed
33.Tam CS	4 untreated 14 pretreated	FludaCyclo 4 cycles	18	PR 13 (76%)	Med DOR 38m	At 37m for untreated pat 100% 5y OS pretrea-ted pat 55%
34.Peinert S	10 untreated 19 pretreated	FludaCyclo FludaCycloRitux FludaMitox FludaRitux	29	ORR 26 (90%) 1 CR, 23 PR, 2 MR	Med PFS 43.1m	5y OS 88% 10y OS 75%	Untreated patients all responded and alive at med 50m
35.Tedeschi A	Untreated Pretreated	FludaCycloRitux 6 cycles	43	ORR 79% Major response 74.4%			After FU continuation improvement leading to 18.6% CR
36.Tedeschi A	Untreated Pretreated	FludaCycloRitux	40	ORR 32 (80%) VGPR 32.5%	Med EFS 77m At med 51m FU, med PFS NR
37.Souchet L	25 untreated 57 pretreated	FludaCycloRitux 5 cycles	82, MED AGE 61y	ORR 85.4%	At med FU 47m, med PFS NR 48m PFS 67%	3y OS 90%	Best response at 10.8 months major resp from 64.6% to 76.8%
38.Hensel M	9 untreated 8 pretreated	PentostCyclo+Ritux + maintenance ritux 4-6 cycles	17	ORR 11 (64.7%) 2 CR, 9 PR	Maintenance rituximab prevented relapse in 10 pat		In pat who received rituximab ORR 76.9%
39.Herth	21 untreated 4 pretreated	PentostCycloRitux	25		1^st line 2y PFS 83.6%, same for maintenance 91.7%	1^st line 2y OS 100%. Same for maintenance 100%	13 pat had rituximab maintenance
40.Treon SP	Rel/ref	BendaRitux Benda +ofatum 5 cycles	30	ORR 25 (83.3%) 5 VGPR, 20 PR	Med PFS 13.2m
41.Tedeschi A	Rel/ref Median 2 lines of treatment	BendaRitux	71, med age 72y	ORR 80.2% Major response 74.6%	At med 19 m med PFS NR
42.Paludo J	43 rel/ref 50 rel/ref	BendaRitux DexaRituxCyclo	60 100	Naïve ORR 93% vs 96% Rel/ref ORR 95% vs 87%	Naïve 2y PFS 88% vs 61% Rel/ref med PFS 58 vs 32m	Med OS NR vs 166m
23.Paludo J	50 untreated 50 rel/ref	DexaRituxCyclo	100	ORR 87% Untreated ORR 96%	Med PFS 32m Untreated med PFS 34m		Med TTNT 50m Untreated med TTNT NR
43.Treon SP	3 untreated 3 rel/ 7 ref	CHOP-R 6 cycles 3 pat maintenance Ritux	13	ORR 12 (92.3%) 3 CR, 8 PR, 1 MR	At 9 m PFS 10 of 13 (76.9%)
44.Ghobrial IM	Pretreated at least one prior therapy	BortezoRitux 4 cycles, Ritux in cycles 1 and 4	37	ORR 81% 2 CR, 17 PR, 11 MR	Med time to progression 15.6m 12m PFS 57% 18m PFS 45%
45.Ghobrial IM	Rel/ref	EverolRitux EverolBortezoRitux maintenanceEverol 6 cycles	10 36	ORR in 36 89% 2CR, >PR 19 (53%)	Med PFS 21m
46.Leblond V	Advanced WM	Bortezo; in nonres-ponding patients dexa after 2^nd cycle 6 cycles	34	ORR after 2 cycles 43.2%	Med PFS 15.3m
47.Dimopoulos MA	Ritux refractory Median 4 prior therapies	Ibrutinib	31, medianage 67y	At med 18.1m ORR 90%, 71% major resp	18m PFS 86%	18m OS 97%	Time to 1^st response 1m
48.Dimopoulos MA	Untreated 45% Pretreated 55%	IbrutinibRitux vs PlaceboRitux	150	ORR 92% vs 47% major response 72% vs 32% VGPR 23% vs 4%	At 30m PFS 82% vs 28%	At 30m OS 94% vs 92%	At 24m in pat with major resp DOR 92% vs 41%

ORR=overall response, PFS=progression free survival, DFS=disease free survival, OS=overall survival, CR=complete response, VGPR=very good partial response, PR=partial response, MR=minor response, DOR=duration of response, NR=not reached, TTNT=time to next treatment, FU=follow-up, rel/ref=relapsed/ refractory, FludaCyclo= fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, FludaCycloRitux= fludarabine, cyclophosposphamide, rituximab, FludaMitox= fludarabine, mitoxantrone, PentostClyco= pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, BendaRitux= bendamustine, rituximab, DexaRituxCyclo= dexamethasone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, CHOP-R= cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, rituximab, BortezoRitux= bortezomib, rituximab, EverolRitux= everolimus, rituximab

Discussion

Comparing the response rates of two to four cycles cladribine monotherapy subcutaneous or intravenous in treatment naïve patients (85% to 100%) with those of other combination regimens of which at least four cycles were administered (dexamethasone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide 83% to 96%[21,23] triple combinations with or without rituximab maintenance 97% vs 68%[24], cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, rituximab 65%[25], dexamethasone, bortezomib, rituximab with or without maintenance 96% vs. 85%[26,28], dexamethasone, bortezomib, rituximab 85% to 88%[27,28], dexamethasone, carfilzomib, rituximab with maintenance 87.1%[29] and ibrutinib 100%[30]), cladribine monotherapy induced high response rates and good durations of response. Compared to ibrutinib, it needs to be considered that ibrutinib has to be taken continuously, and that an IgM rebound occurs after discontinuation whereas only two to four cycles of cladribine are required to induce 85% to 100% overall response for a median duration of 23 months in treatment naïve patients . Thus cladribine, which can be administered subcutaneously, is a cost-saving treatment in situations in which ibrutinib is not available, or costs of ibrutinib treatment prevent the use, Cladribine monotherapy was moderately efficient in studies in which treatment naïve and pretreated patients were combined (28.6% to 68%). However, the combination of subcutaneous cladribine plus rituximab for four cycles induced an overall response of 89.6 % in treatment naïve and pretreated patients, and at 43 months follow-up only four of twenty six patients had relapsed for a relapse free survival of 84.6%[18]. With other combinations in studies in which treatment naïve and pretreated patients were combined response rates were as following: fludarabine, cyclophosphamide 55% to 76%[32,33], fludrabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab 79% to 90%[34-37] pentostatine, cyclophosphamide with or without rituximab 64.7%[38], bendamustine, rituximab with or without cyclophosphamide 87% vs. 80.2%[23,40-42], cyclophosphamide, doxorubine, vincristine, prednisone, rituximab and rituximab maintenance 92.3%[43], bortezomib combinations 81% to 89%[44], bortezomib monotherapy 43.2%[46], ibrutibinib 90%[47] and ibrutinib,rituximab 92%[48]. Thus the cladribine with rituximab combination induced overall response rates that were comparable with other combinations[18]. Also in this setting cladribine with rituximab would be a good alternative in case ibrutinib is not available or costs of ibrutrinib treatment prevent the use.

Conclusion

Cladribine monotherapy is an efficient treatment in treatment naïve symptomatic WM and two to four cycles intravenous or subcutaneous cladribine induced high response rates. Cladribine in combination with other drugs is also efficient in treatment naïve patients. Cladribine monotherapy is moderately efficient in cohorts in which treatment naïve and pretreated patients are combined and analyzed jointly. The combination of subcutaneous cladribine plus rituximab is though highly efficient in this setting. In the era of combination treatment and new drugs the results with cladribine indicate that its use should be considered in the treatment of treatment naïve and pretreated patients.

Declaration

The author is consultant to Lipomed AG.

References

1. Groves, F.D., Travis, L.B., Devesa, S.S., et al. Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia: incidence patterns in the United States. (1998) Cancer 82(6): 1078-1081.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others

2. Phekoo, K.J., Jack, R.H., Davies, E., et al. The incidence and survival of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia in South East England. (2008) Leuk Res 32(1): 55-59.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
3. Sigal, D.S., Miller, H.J., Schram, E.D., et al. Beyond hairy cell: the activity of cladribine in other hematologic malignancies. (2010) Blood 116(16): 2884-2896.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
4. Dimopoulos, M.A., Kantarjian, H., Estey, E., et al. Treatment of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. (1993) Annals of Int Medic 118(3): 195-198.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
5. Dimopoulos, M.A., O’Brien, S., Kantarjian, H., et al. Treatment of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia with nucleoside analogues. (1993) Leukemia and Lymphoma 11(2): 105-108.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
6. Zaucha, J.M., Ciesielski, D., Greib, P., et al. 2-Chloro-2-deoxyadenosine (2-CdA) treatment in a patient with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia complicated by severe neutrocytopenia (1994) Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 42(1): 35-37.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
7. Dimopoulos, M.A., Weber, D.M., Kantarjian, H., et al. 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine therapy of patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia previously treated with fludarabine. (1994) Annals of Oncol 5(3): 288-289.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
8. Delannoy, A., Ferrant, A., Martiat, P., et al. 2-Clorodeoxyadenosine therapy in Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (1994) Nouv Rev Fr Hematol 36(4): 317-320.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
9. Dimopoulos, M.A., Kantarjian, H., Weber, D., et al. Primary therapy of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. (1994) J Clin Oncol 12(12): 2694-2698.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
10. Dimopoulos, M.A., Weber, D., Delasalle, K.B., et al. Treatment of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia resistant to standard therapy with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine: identification of prognostic factors. (1995) Annals Oncolo 6(1): 49-52.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
11. Richards, A.I. Response of meningeal Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia to 2-chlorodeoxyadnosine. (1995) J Clin Oncol 13(9): 2476.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
12. Fridik, M.A., Jager, G., Baldinger, C., et al. First line treatment of Waldenstrom’s disease with cladribine. (1997) Ann Hematol 74(1): 7-10.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
13. Betticher, D.C., Ratschiller, D., Egger, T., et al.Cladribine (2-CdA) given as subcutaneous bolus injection is active in pretreated Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (1997) British J Haematol 99(2): 358-363.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
14. Liu, E.S., Burian, C., Miller, W.E., et al. Bolus administration of cladribine in the treatment of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (1998) Br J Haematol 103(3): 690-695.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
15. Hellmann, A., Lewandowski, H.A., Zaucha, J.M., et al. Effect of a 2-hour infusion of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine in the treatment of refractory or previously untreated Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (1999) Eur J Haematol 63: 35-41.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
16. Lewandowski, K., Zaucha, J.M., Bieniaszewska, M., et al. 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine treatment of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia – the analysis of own experience and review of the literature. (2000) Med Sci Monit 6(4): 740-745.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
17. Weber, D.M., Dimopoulos, M.A., Delasalle, K., et al. 2-Clorodeoxyadenosine alone and in combination for previously untreated Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (2003) Seminars in Oncol 30(2): 243-247.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
18. Laszlo, D., Andreola, G., Rigacci, L., et al. Rituximab and subcutaneous 2-chloro-2-desoxyadenosine combination treatment for patients with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia: clinical and biological results of a phase II multicenter study. (2010) J Clin Oncol 28(13): 2233-2238.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
19. Khorshid, O., Namour, A.E., El-Gammal, M.M., et al. Efficacy and Safety of Cladribine: Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration in hairy cell leukemia patients. (2015) Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 7(1): 2015058.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
20. Schmitz, S.F., Tichelli, A., Hess, U., et al. Treatment of hairy cell leukemia with cladribine by subcutaneous bolus injection: a phase II study. (2002) Ann Oncol 13(10): 1641-1649.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
21. Dimopoulos, M.A., Anagnostopoulos, A., Kyrtsonis, M.C., et al. Primary treatment of Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia with dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide. (2007) J Clin Oncol 25(22): 3344-3349.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
22. Kastritis, E., Gavriatopoupou, M., Kyrtsonis, M.C., et al. Dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide as primary treatment of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia: final analysis of a phase 2 study. (2015) Blood 126(11): 1392-1394.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
23. Paludo, J., Abeykoon, J.P., Kumar, S., et al. Dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide for relapsed and/or refractory and treatment naïve patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. (2017) Br J haematol 179(1): 98-105.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
24. Castillo, J.J., Gustine, J.N., Meid, K., et al. Response and survival for primary therapy combination regimens and maintenance rituximab in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. (2018) Br J Haematol 181(1): 77-85.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
25. Sekiguchi, N., Hamano, A., Kitagawa, T., et al. Impact of rituximab and half-dose CHOP as primary therapy for untreated symptomatic Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia: review of combined regimen of rituximab with and alkylating agent. (2018) Blood Res 53(2): 117-122.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
26. Treon, S.P., Loakimidis, L., Soumerai, J.D., et al. Primary therapy of Waldenstrom macroglobulinenia with bortezomib, dexamethasone and rituximab: WMCTG clinical trials 05-180. (2009) J Clin Oncol 27(23): 3830-3835.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
27. Ghobrial, I.M., Xie, W., Padmanabhan, S., et al. Phase II trial of weekly bortezomib in combination with rituximab in untreated patients with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia. (2010) Am J Hematol 85(9): 670-674.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
28. Dimopoulos, M.A., Garcia-Sanz, R., Gavriatopoulou, M., et al. Primary therapy of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia with weekly bortezomib, low dose dexamethasone and rituximab: long-term results of a phase 2 study of the European Myeloma Network. (2013) Blood 122(19): 3276-3282.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
29. Treon, S.P., Tripsas, C.K., Meid, K., et al. Carfilzomib, rituximab and dexamethasone treatment offers a neuropathy-sparing approach for treating Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (2014) Blood 124(4): 503-510.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
30. Treon, S.P., Gustine, J., Meid, K., et al. Ibrutinib monotherapy in symptomatic treatment-naïve patients with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia. (2018) J Clin Oncol 36(27): 2755-2761.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
31. Gustine, J.N., Meid, K., Dubeau, T., et al. (2018) Am J Hematol 93(4): 511-517.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
32. Dimopoulos, M.A., Hamilos, G., Efstathiou, E., et al. Treatment of Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia with the combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. (2003) Leuk Lymphoma 44(6): 993-996.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
33. Tam, C.S., Wolf, M.M., Westerma, D., et al. Fludarabine combination is highly effective in first line salvage treatment of patients with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (2005) Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 6(2): 136-139.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
34. Peinert, S., Tam, C.S., Prince, H.M., et al. Fludarabine based combinations are highly effective as first line or salvage treatment in patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. (2010) Leuk Lymphoma 51(12): 2188-2197.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
35. Tedeschi, A., Benevolo, G., Varonetti, M., et al. Fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide and rituximab in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia: an effective but myelosuppressive regimen to be offered to patients with advanced disease. (2012) Cancer 118(2): 434-443.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
36. Tedeschi, A., Rici, F., Gildaniga, M.C., et al. Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab in salvage therapy of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (2013) Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 13(2): 231-234.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
37. Souchet, L., Levy, V., Ouzegdouh, M., et al. Efficacy and long term toxicity of rituximab-fludarabine-cyclophosphamide combination therapy in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. (2016) Am J hematol 91(8): 782-786.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
38. Hensel, M., Villalobos, M., Kornacker, M.,et al. Pentostatin/cyclophosphamide with or without rituximab: an effective regimen for patients with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. (2005) Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 6(2): 131-135.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
39. Hert, I., Hensel, M., Riegel, M., et al. Pentostatin, cyclophosphamide and rituximab is a safe and effective treatment in patients with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (2015) Leuk Lymphoma 56(1): 97-102.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
40. Treon, S.P., Hanzis, C., Tripsas, C., et al. Bendamustine therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (2011) Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 11(1): 133-135.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
41. Tedeschi, A., Picardi, P., Ferrero, S., et al. Bendamustine and rituximab combination is safe and effective as salvage regimen in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. (2015) Leuk Lymphoma 56(9): 2637-2642.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
42. Paludo, J., Abeykoon, J.P., Shreders, A., et al. Bendamustine and rituximab versus dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide in patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. (2018) Ann Hematol 97(8): 1417-1425.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
43. Treon, S.P., Hunter, Z., Barnagan, A.R. CHOP plus rituximab therapy in Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. (2005) Clin Lymphoma 5(4): 273-277.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
44. Ghobrial, I.M., Hong, F., Padmanabhan, S., et al. Phase II trials of weekly bortezomib in combination with rituximab in relapsed or relapsed and refractory Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. (2010) J Clin Oncol 28(8): 1422-1428.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
45. Ghobrial, I.M., Redd, R., Armand, P., et al. Phase I/II trial of everolimus in combination with bortezomib and rituximab in relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. (2015) Leuk 29(12): 2338-2346.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
46. Leblond, V., Morel, P., Dilhuidy, M.S., et al. A phase II Bayesian sequential clinical trials in advanced Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients treated with bortezomib: interest of addition of dexamethasone. (2017) Leuk Lymphoma 58(11): 2615-2623.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
47.Dimopouplos, M.A., Trotman, J., Tedeschi, A., et al. Ibrutinib for patients with rituximab-refractory Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia: an open-label substudy of an international multicenter phase 3 trial. (2017) Lancet oncol 18(2): 241-250.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others
48. Dimopoulos, M.A., Tedeschi, A., Trotman, J., et al. Phase 3 trial of ibrutinib plus rituximab in Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia. (2018) N Engl J Med 378(25): 2399-2410.
Pubmed| Crossref | Others

18
Total Download	PDF	CITATION	XML