Computational Screening of Anti-diabetic molecules from Microalgae Metabolites by Molecular docking
Satyavani Kaliamurthi1, Zeynep Elibol Cakmak1,2, Turgay Cakmak
Affiliation
- 1Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University, 34730, Istanbul, Turkey
- 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Kirikkale University, 71450, Kirikkale, Turkey
Corresponding Author
Dr. Turgay Cakmak, Phytoprocess Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey, E-mail: turgay.cakmak@medeniyet.edu.tr
Dr. Gurudeeban Selvaraj, Phytoprocess Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey, Tel: +90-216-280-3505, Fax: 90-216-280-2021E-mail: gurudeeb99@gmail.com
Citation
Gurudeeban, S., et al. Computational Screening of Anti-diabetic molecules from Microalgae Metabolites by Molecular docking (2017) Bioinfo Proteom Img Anal 3(1):187- 193.
Copy rights
© 2017 Gurudeeban, S. This is an Open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, DockThor, glucokinase, microalgae, lutein
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of microalgae metabolites as a ligand for anti-diabetic target proteins namely, glucokinase, fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase, glycogen synthase kinase, cytochrome P450, multi-drug resistant protein, and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) using computational approach. Three-dimensional structure of microalgal metabolites retrieved from PubChem database and the energy minimized. The active site of target protein predicted through PDB sum. Molecular docking has performed with microalgae metabolites using Hex 8.0 and DockThor server. Hex docking revealed binding fucoxanthin was higher with fructose 1,6 bis-phosphatase (-298.31), human multidrug resistant protein 1 (-369.67), and PPARγ (-404.18). DockThor docking suggested Zeaxanthin with glucokinase produced higher total energy (111.23 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-2.99 kcal/mol). Lutein with fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase, human multidrug resistant protein, glycogen synthase kinase, PPARγ, and cytochrome p450 produced higher total energy and interaction energy. Further studies will assess the anti-diabetic effect of carotenoids of microalgae, especially lutein, zeaxanthin, and fucoxanthin.
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex disorder incorporating severe insulin dysfunction with gross variations from the norm in glucose homeostasis, lipid and protein digestive system[1]. In the World, people with type II DM and its complication would be triple in the number at the end of 2025[2]. Type II DM mainly influences people in developing nations like Turkey. It has affected the youthful populace in the prime of their working lives and afterward represents a more prominent risk to the well-being of these people[3]. Different targets involved in regulating glucose and fatty acid metabolism reported by several researchers includes aldose reductase, cytochrome P450, fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase, glucokinase, multidrug resistant protein and PPARγ. The inhibitory action of these receptors is an alternative treatment to diabetes mellitus[4].
Microalgae are the rich source of high value-added compounds including pigments, carotenoids, fatty acids, sterols,and proteins. These metabolites were identified from different species Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Arthrospira, Porphyridium, Dunaliella salina, Haematococcus pluvialis, Chlorella protothecosis, Prorocentrum minimum, Lyngbya majuscule, and Synechococcus[5-8]. The extract and metabolites of microalgae showed various pharmacological activities viz., anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antiviral, dietary supplement antioxidants and anti-tumour agents[9,10]. To the best of our knowledge, there was no information on microalgae specific metabolites in treating diabetes mellitus. Structure-based drug design is an essential study to examine the lead compounds to prevent the drug withdrawn from the clinical and development[11]. Predicting the target sites of molecules using bioinformatics tools would be valuable and time efficient in pharmaceutical applications to make a confident elimination, avoid costly late-stage preclinical and clinical failures. It covers and identifies the lead candidate, binding pocket, determination of target structure, and evaluation of the potential lead candidate[12]. Based on this information, the present study aimed to evaluate the inhibitory action of microalgae metabolites to some target protein related to glucose metabolism and diabetes mellitus.
Materials and Methods
Tools and software: The present study performed using bioinformatics tools, biological databases like Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/), PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), Chimera, 3DLigandStie (https://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/3dligandsite/) and software’s like Open Babel 2.3.1., DruLiTo, Hex 8.0 and DockThor (https://dockthor.lncc.br/).
Preparation of ligands: The bioactive metabolites of microalgae such as carotenoids, PUFA, sterols, alkaloids, and protein have used as ligands (Table 1). The two-dimensional (2D) chemical structures of the ligands downloaded from the PubChem database as .sdf format. The 2D of the selected ligands converted into their 3D formats using Chem Sketch and it saved as .mol format. Further, the selected .mol format of lead converted into a .pdb format using Open Babel 2.3.1. Sub-atomic adaptability considered by every ligand as a gathering of conformers communicating to various zones of the conformational space available to the particle within a given energy range. This explored adopting the best conformer with Chimera, which based on the generalized CHARMM force field implementation with default features. This program will uniformly identify the best three-dimensional arrangements of ligands, exploring the variations across the target receptors.
Preparation of Receptors: Receptors have selected based on the previous reports[4]. The PDB used to download the target proteins Glucokinase (PDB ID: 1V4S), Fructose 1, 6 bisphosphatase (PDB ID: 2JJK), Human multidrug resistance protein (PDB ID: 2CBZ), and Cytochrome P450 (PDB ID: 3LC4), PPARγ (PDB ID: 1ZGY), glycogen synthase kinase (PDB ID: 1H8F). To visualize receptors and ligands performed using the molecular graphics program PyMol.
Table 1: Physiochemical properties of selected microalgae metabolites.
No. of ligands | Name of the ligand | Molecular Weight (g/mol) | logP | Hydrogen bond acceptor | Hydrogen bond donor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ligand 1 | Astaxanthin | 596.39 | 9.696 | 4 | 2 |
Ligand 2 | Arachidonic acid | 304.24 | 8.349 | 2 | 1 |
Ligand 3 | Brassicasterol | 398.35 | 10.50 | 1 | 1 |
Ligand 4 | β-Stigma sterol | 412.37 | 11.07 | 1 | 1 |
Ligand 5 | β-Carotene | 536.44 | 14.73 | 0 | 0 |
Ligand 6 | Canthaxanthin | 564.4 | 10.78 | 2 | 0 |
Ligand 7 | Docosahexaenoic acid | 328.24 | 8.833 | 2 | 1 |
Ligand 8 | Eicosapentaenoic acid | 302.22 | 8.022 | 2 | 1 |
Ligand 9 | Fucoxanthin | 658.42 | 9.874 | 6 | 6 |
Ligand 10 | γ-amino butyric acid | 103.06 | -0.66 | 3 | 2 |
Ligand 11 | γ-linolenic acid | 278.22 | 7.538 | 2 | 1 |
Ligand 12 | Lutein | 568.43 | 11.28 | 2 | 2 |
Ligand 13 | Lycopene | 536.44 | 14.58 | 0 | 0 |
Ligand 14 | Microcolin A | 747.48 | 4.643 | 14 | 2 |
Ligand 15 | Okadoic acid | 804.47 | 2.973 | 13 | 5 |
Ligand 16 | Zeaxanthin | 568.43 | 10.56 | 2 | 2 |
Drug-likeness predictions: DruLiTo had used to find out lead like a candidate based on eight filters (Lipinski’s rule, MDDR- like rule, Veber rule, Ghose filter, BBB rule, CMC-50 like the rule, weighted and unweighted Quantitative Estimate of Drug-likeness). Toxicity analysis of selected ligands had performed earlier with Vega-QSAR[13].
Active sites prediction: 3DLigandStie is an online tool to predict the binding site of a protein. It uses the idea of binding energy between the protein and Vander Waals test to find enthusiastically good binding pockets. Energetically favourable probe sites clustered according to their spatial nearness and clusters then ranked according to energies for sites within each cluster. These clusters placed in rank seek of the likelihood of being a binding site as showed by total binding energies for each cluster.
Docking using Hex: Hex is an Interactive Molecular Graphics Program for calculating and displaying feasible acids and smallbimolecular. The program reads in molecular coordinate files and interactively displays the molecule on the screen in various representations and colour schemes. Therefore, the present study docking analysis of target proteins with microalgae metabolites carried out using HEX 8.0. Docking decides the ligand with best scores and identifying the drug-receptor complex with lowest free energy. The metabolites docked with the receptor using the following features.
1. Correlation type – Shape + Electrostatics
2. FFT Mode - 3D
3. Post Processing- MM Energies
4. Grid Dimension - 0.6
5. Receptor range – 180
6. Ligand range – 180
7. Twist range – 360
8. Distance Range – 40
Docking using DockThor server: The best scores and lowest free energy of the metabolite of Hex docking further studied with the DockThor program. It has carried out a flexible ligand and rigid-receptor grid-based method. DockThor® employs a multiple solutions genetic algorithm as the search method[14] and the MMFF94S force field as the scoring function for ranking the created poses (https://dockthor.lncc.br/). Ligand and protein setup are available on the DockThor Portal, being possible to change the amino acid residues protonation states and include cofactors (e.g. structural water molecules, metals, organic molecules) as rigid entities. Grid size 34 Å, dimension x-17; y-17; z-17 and discretization 0.35 used. Hydrogen bond contacts, lipophilic contacts, and non-bonded contacts have calculated using LIGPLOT[15].
Results
Prediction of physiochemical and Drug–likeness properties of ligands: The physiochemical property includes molecular weight, the number of hydrogen bond acceptor and donor of selected microalgae metabolites showed in Table 1. The drug-likeness properties such as compound’s hydrophilicity, the polar surface area prediction, molecular refractivity, number of rotatable bonds, number of an atom, the number of acidic groups, rotatable bond count, the number of rigid bond, number of atom ring, number of hydrogen bonds, structure alerts explained in Table 2.
Table 2: Drug likeness properties of selected microalgae metabolites.
No. of ligand | Alogp | TPSA | AMR | nRB | nAtom | nAcidic Group | RC | nRigidB | nArom Ring | nHB | SAlerts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ligand 1 | 7.624 | 74.6 | 196.2 | 10 | 96 | 0 | 2 | 35 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
Ligand 2 | 1.264 | 37.3 | 94.09 | 14 | 54 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Ligand 3 | 1.933 | 20.2 | 122.21 | 4 | 75 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Ligand 4 | 1.257 | 20.2 | 125.29 | 5 | 78 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Ligand 5 | 8.935 | 0 | 189.29 | 10 | 96 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Ligand 6 | 8.928 | 34.1 | 193.53 | 10 | 94 | 0 | 2 | 33 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Ligand 7 | 2.933 | 37.3 | 111.27 | 14 | 56 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
Ligand 8 | 2.115 | 37.3 | 99 | 13 | 52 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Ligand 9 | 6.631 | 96.4 | 202.15 | 12 | 106 | 0 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 8 | 6 |
Ligand 10 | -1.231 | 63.3 | 23.61 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Ligand 11 | 0.446 | 37.3 | 81.82 | 13 | 50 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Ligand 12 | 8.621 | 40.5 | 195.47 | 10 | 98 | 0 | 2 | 33 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
Ligand 13 | 11.573 | 0 | 198.04 | 16 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Ligand 14 | -2.604 | 173.9 | 192.89 | 24 | 118 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 16 | 3 |
Ligand 15 | -3.194 | 182.8 | 189.23 | 10 | 125 | 1 | 7 | 53 | 0 | 18 | 1 |
Ligand 16 | 8.49 | 40.5 | 195.39 | 10 | 98 | 0 | 2 | 33 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
AlogP: compound’s Hydrophilicity, TPSA: The Polar Surface Area Prediction, AMR: molecular refractivity, nRB: number of Rotatable Bonds, n Atom: number of Atom, n Acidic Group: number of acidic groups, RC: Rotatable bond count, nRigidB: number of rigid bond, nAtomRing: number of Atom Ring, nHB: number of Hydrogen Bond, SAlerts: Structure alerts.
Figure 1: Predicted binding site residues of glycogen synthase kinase using Ligand Site.
Prediction of active sites residues in receptor: Computational approaches screen the possibilities of microalgae metabolites (ligand) to treat diabetes and its complication. Glucokinase has the following residues in the active sites GLU 256, PHE 152, PRO 153, THR 168, SER 151, GLY 229, GLU 290, ASP 205, GLC 500, LYS 169, ASN 204, and ASN 231. Fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase have THR 31, ALA 24, GLY 28, ARG 22, MET 18, ARG 22, ALA 24, VAL 17, THR 31, LEU 30, GLY 28, and THR 27. Human multidrug resistant proteins have GLN 713, LYS 684, VAL 680, GLY 681, THR 660, SER 686, TRP 653, ATP 1873, CYS 682 and. Cytochrome P450 have ASN 367, PHE 470, PHE 429, HIS 370, GLY 438, THR 307, TRP 128, ARG 109, HIS 109 residues in their active site. PPARγ have HIS 323, PHE 282, LEU 469, HIS 449, TYR 327, ILE 326, CYS 285, MET 364 and Glycogen synthase kinase have 28ILE, 33PHE, 36VAL, 49ALA, 51LYS, 76VAL, 99ASP, 100TYR, 101VAL, 104THR, 151GLN, 152ASN, 154LEU, 165CYS, 166 ASP residues in their active site (Figure.1).
Docking of microalgae metabolites with receptors: Hex server based docking results of the aldose reductase, cytochrome P450, Glucokinase and fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase, permeability glycoprotein, PPARγ with ligands of microalgae metabolites interaction energy shown in Table 3. Binding of fucoxanthin simulated higher total binding energy with fructose 1,6 bis-phosphatase, multidrug resistant protein 1, and PPARγ. Lutein simulated total binding energy with glycogen synthase kinase, and Zeaxanthin simulated higher total binding energy with glucokinase and cytochrome p450. Among the 16 major microalgae metabolites Fucoxanthin, Lutein and Zeaxanthin have simulated higher binding energy with anti-diabetic target proteins. DHA, gamma linolenic acid, EPA, and GABA had shown least binding energy with targets compared to carotenoids. Microcolin A and okadaic acid stimulated higher binding energy with target proteins compared to fatty acids.
DockThor simulation carried out to confirm binding target proteins with fucoxanthin, Lutein, Zeaxanthin, microcolin A and okadaic acid. Table 4 points to the results of total energy and binding energy. Docking simulation of lutein with fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase produced higher total energy (145.66 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-23.01 kcal/mol) on the first run. Lutein with the multidrug resistant protein produced higher total energy (1,48,085 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-8.531 kcal/mol) on the 8th run. Zeaxanthin with glucokinase produced higher total energy (111.23 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-2.99 kcal/mol) on the 25th run. Lutein with glycogen synthase kinase produced higher total energy (1, 59,766 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-0.018 kcal/mol) on the 11th run. Lutein with PPARγ produced higher total energy (135.38 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-30.604 kcal/mol) on the 8th run. Lutein with cytochrome p450 produced higher total energy (137.113 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-30.279 kcal/mol) on the 10th run. Figure. 2 showed the molecular interaction of lead candidates with target receptor.
Table 3: Molecular Docking of Microalgae metabolites ligands using Hex.
S.No | Total energy (kcal/mol) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBP | GK | CP450 | MDRP 1 | PPARγ | GSK | |
Ligand 1 | -255.35 | -380.75 | -379.21 | -371.26 | -360.17 | -275.43 |
Ligand 2 | -190.95 | -266.64 | -276.99 | -221.88 | -284.43 | -264.93 |
Ligand 3 | -199.54 | -312.94 | -300.23 | -260.21 | -299.89 | -261.81 |
Ligand 4 | -218.84 | -288.89 | -306.25 | -271.86 | -306.48 | -307.37 |
Ligand 5 | -250.02 | -367.48 | -363.17 | -357.48 | -365.68 | -299.81 |
Ligand 6 | -254.87 | -378.28 | -388.87 | -372.98 | -355.12 | -275.58 |
Ligand 7 | -171.82 | -285.18 | -296.26 | -232.31 | -277.52 | -253.61 |
Ligand 8 | -191.82 | -262.72 | -255.94 | -230.14 | -286.69 | -299.62 |
Ligand 9 | -298.31 | -385.36 | -377.89 | -369.67 | -404.18 | -286.01 |
Ligand 10 | -191.95 | -131.68 | -138.12 | -122.75 | -144.56 | -129.83 |
Ligand 11 | -172.49 | -269.41 | -297.65 | -235.28 | -247.04 | -242.52 |
Ligand 12 | -248.41 | -371.49 | -402.54 | -361.96 | -373.62 | -268.8 |
Ligand 13 | -270.11 | -349.86 | -257.95 | -343.28 | -344.42 | -382.39 |
Ligand 14 | -279.61 | -349.92 | -340.97 | -359.49 | -366.06 | -339.62 |
Ligand 15 | -289.19 | -363.81 | -366.84 | -359.49 | -391.88 | -331.52 |
Ligand 16 | -247.55 | -404.38 | -409.42 | -367.59 | -373.34 | -259.2 |
C P450 - cytochrome p450; FBP - fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase; GK – glucokinase; GSK – glycogen synthase kinase; MDRP1 - multidrug resistance protein1; PPARγ- peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ;
Figure 2: Docking interaction of lutein and zeaxanthin with target receptors predicted by LigPlot (blue line - ligand bonds; red line - non ligand bonds; dotted lines - hydrogen bonds and its length; half red circle – non ligand residues involved in the hydrophobic contacts; black dots - corresponding atoms involved in the hydrophobic contacts). (a) The atomic interaction between HE21 atom of the GLN267 (red colour) in the cytochrome p450 receptor and an oxygen atom of lutein; (b) The atomic interaction between OD2 atom of the ASP199 (red colour) in the fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase and oxygen atom of Lutein; (c) The atomic interaction between oxygen atom of the PRO312 and PHE 62 (red colour) in the glucokinase receptor and a hydrogen atom of zeaxanthin; (d) The atomic interaction between HN, HH21 atom of the ARG96 and ARG144 (red colour) in the glycogen synthase kinase receptor and an oxygen atom of lutein; (e) The atomic interaction between oxygen atom of the ARG 780 (red colour) in the human multidrug resistant protein and a hydrogen atom of lutein; (f) The atomic interaction between oxygen atom of the ALA300 (red colour) in the PPARγ receptor and ahydrogen atom of lutein.
Table 4: Molecular Docking of Selected ligands using DockThor Server.
Receptor | Ligand | Run | Total energy (Kcal/mol) | Interaction energy (Kcal/mol) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase | Ligand 9 | 28 | 91.21 | -22.31 |
Ligand 12 | 1 | 145.66 | -23.51 | |
Ligand 14 | 18 | 56.72 | -25.24 | |
Ligand 15 | 18 | 56.72 | -25.25 | |
Ligand 16 | 28 | 96.11 | -19.99 | |
Glucokinase | Ligand 9 | 10 | 103.49 | -2.58 |
Ligand 12 | 9 | 101.2 | -2.07 | |
Ligand 14 | 3 | 75.52 | -3.66 | |
Ligand 15 | 1 | 76.71 | -3.97 | |
Ligand 16 | 25 | 111.23 | -2.99 | |
Human Multidrug resistant protein | Ligand 9 | 26 | 98,172 | -10,209 |
Ligand 12 | 8 | 1,48,085 | -8,531 | |
Ligand 14 | 18 | 67,357 | -13,554 | |
Ligand 15 | 18 | 67,357 | -13,554 | |
Ligand 16 | 20 | 1,07,047 | -7,888 | |
Glycogen synthase kinase | Ligand 9 | 20 | 1,06,039 | -0.016 |
Ligand 12 | 11 | 1,59,766 | -0.018 | |
Ligand 14 | 8 | 79,959 | -0.033 | |
Ligand 15 | 8 | 79,959 | -0.033 | |
Ligand 16 | 14 | 1,14,133 | -0.014 | |
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor | Ligand 9 | 12 | 94.671 | -22.822 |
Ligand 12 | 8 | 135.384 | -30.604 | |
Ligand 14 | 18 | 49.631 | -32.991 | |
Ligand 15 | 18 | 49.631 | -32.991 | |
Ligand 16 | 28 | 96.111 | -19.995 | |
Cytochrome P450 | Ligand 9 | 8 | 81.088 | -27.564 |
Ligand 12 | 10 | 137.113 | -30.279 | |
Ligand 14 | 30 | 52.591 | -27.459 | |
Ligand 15 | 30 | 52.591 | -27.459 | |
Ligand 16 | 13 | 88.041 | -27.111 |
Discussion
Hex is an interactive modern molecular graphics program can calculate protein-ligand docking, protein –protein docking and protein– nucleotides docking modes. In protein- ligand docking, assuming the ligand is rigid, and it can superpose pairs of three-dimensional structures of molecules[16]. The superpose can use as spherical polar fourier (SPF) correlations to quicken the calculations. It encodes both surface shape and electrostatic charge and potential distributions. This study the electrostatic charge distribution of microalgae metabolites with the surface of targets calculated. The surface states of proteins using a two-term surface skin besides van der Waals steric thickness model, though the electrostatic model gets from traditional electrostatic hypothesis[17].
The DockThor Portal, developed by the group GMMSB/LNCC, is a free receptor-ligand docking server. The completed program is a flexible ligand and rigid-receptor gridbased method that employs a multiple solutions genetic algorithm along the MMFF94S molecular force field scoring. In the present study, the active site amino acids residues of targets change to confirm the binding affinity with the ligand. An enormous number of polyunsaturated fatty acids, carotenoids, carbohydrates, and sterols produce nontoxic manner under different stress condition[18]. Taouis et al[19] pointed out the attention to the healthy supplements improved with omega 3-unsaturated fats expanded the cell plasticity and reduced the inadequate insulin action caused by the store of high fatty acids. There is a strong association between the control of blood glucose and prevention rate of micro vascular complications (diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy)[20]. Therefore, the present study sixteen different microalgae metabolites had evaluated in their inhibitory action against target proteins.
Glucokinase and fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase are the most important enzymes to regulate blood glucose level in human liver. The activities of these enzymes enhanced production of glucose through glycerol or gluconeogenic amino acids[21]. The constant formation of glucose affected serious non-insulin dependent diabetic conditions. The analogs of lutein and zeaxanthin reported having a significant binding affinity with glucokinase and glycogen synthase[22]. The similar results noted in glucokinase, glycogen synthase and fructose1,6 bisphosphatase with three different carotenoids lutein, fucoxanthin, and zeaxanthin. Permeability glycoprotein causes genetic variations in transporters protein leads to decrease the high-density lipoprotein, increase the blood glucose level, cystic fibrosis, acute damage to retina and kidney of diabetic patients[23]. Cytochrome p450 enzyme involved in regulating ADME properties of endogenous and exogenous compounds through activate or deactivate the drug molecules[24]. Surprisingly, a severe hyperglycaemic condition associated with free radical formation leads to hepatocellular damage and promoted CYP450 dependent monooxygenase enzyme in diabetic rats[25]. The dietary fucoxanthin showed greater decrease in blood glucose level, plasma insulin concentration and increase the activity of enzymatic antioxidants in diabetic/obese KK-A mice model[26]. It showed potential DPPH free radical scavenging activity than compared to other carotenoids under anaerobic condition[27]. In our study, docking of fucoxanthin with cytochrome p450, glucokinase and MDRP-1 showed potential binding[28] report fucoxanthin from edible marine seaweed Undaria pinnatifida could decrease the rifampin-affected Cytochrome p450 3A4 and multiple drug resistance 1 expression through attenuation of Human pregnane X receptor-mediated CYP3A4 promoter activation. Earlier studies reported fucoxanthin and fucoxanthinol have the potential to reduce body fat and lipid accumulation by restraint of 3T3-L1 adipocyte cells differentiation by control of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor A[29]. The combined effect of PPAR active ligands such as fucoxanthin and troglitazone have potentially decreased the of colon cancer CaCO2 cells. Additionally, the purified fucoxanthin ligand from showed significant DNA fragmentation in CaCO2 colon cancer cell lines than compared to astaxanthin and beta-carotene[30]. Kohno et al.[31] report chemically induces colon tumorigenesis significantly inhibited by the troglitazone PPAR ligand molecules. Therefore, fucoxanthin may represent a therapeutic target to treat diabetes-induced oxidative stress and hyperlipidemic condition.
Glycogen synthase kinase is a serine or threonine kinase enzyme which involves in the glycogen and protein synthesis[32]. However, the overexpression of glycogen synthase kinase leads to insulin inability which causes a huge amount of glucose deposition in the respective muscles. There are reports on glycogen synthase kinase inhibition accelerating act insulin and glucose metabolism in type II DM patients skeletal muscles[33]. In the present study, the lutein showed high binding energy with Glycogen synthase kinase. The in silico findings might provide new insight to treat type II DM. Reduced level of lutein and zeaxanthin in the dietary supplement cause age-related macular degeneration diseases in humans which affect the individual central vision. Bone et al[34] reported, the graded doses treatment of lutein (2.4 to 30 mg/d) and Zeaxanthin significantly increased the serum concentration and macular pigment density in the human subjects. Prolonged hyperglycaemia conditions decreased the level of antioxidants, nitrotyrosine and increased apoptotic conditions in the retina cells. The vision losses in diabetic rats reduce by oral administration of 0.5 mg/kg of lutein up to 12 weeks[35]. Also, the lutein adjuvant therapies need further studies to improve effective drug molecules. Lutein could decrease damaging cerebral I/R in stroke patients[36]. The present study supports this information which explains to inhibit aldose reductase by lutein and zeaxanthin. Overproduction of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress are closely associated with various health issues such as progression of atherosclerosis, hypercholesterolemia, ischemic reperfusion, and diabetes with advanced glycation products, hyperlipidemia, foot ulcer complications, cardiovascular diseases and further endothelial dysfunction[37]. PPAR γ also called as glitazone receptor, which is involved in the regulation of fatty acid storage and glucose metabolism in humans. Remarkably, the PPAR-γ concerned in the pathology of various diseases including diabetes mellitus, obesity, and atherosclerosis[38]. Astaxanthin and canthaxanthin are keto-carotenoids generously present in algae, rarely seen in plants[39]. A red fat-soluble pigment astaxanthin from H.pluvialis used as feed for fish. Previous studies showed the antioxidant of astaxanthin is about higher that compared to zeaxanthin, lutein, canthaxanthin, beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol[40]. Oral administration of astaxanthin significantly reduces the plasma glucose level in alloxan-induced diabetic mice[41]. The dietary intake of 0.1% fucoxanthin significantly reduced lipid hydroperoxide levels of the liver, abdominal white adipose tissue and blood glucose levels ofKK-Ay mice[42].
Conclusion
Microalgae metabolites especially lutein, fucoxanthin and zeaxanthin be an excellent source for developing the novel antidiabetic drug. Further experimental studies will confirm the therapeutic efficacy of these carotenoids.
Acknowledge:
The authors are grateful to The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK -2216), Ankara, Turkey for the financial support during the study period.
References
- 1. Dolores Shoback., David, G, Gardner., Greenspan's basic & clinical endocrinology (9th ed.). (2011) New York: McGraw-Hill Medical pp. Chapter 17.
- 2. Li, R. X., Yiu, W. H., Wu, H. J., et al. BMP7 reduces inflammation and oxidative stress in diabetic tubulopathy. (2015) Clin Sci 128(4): 269-280.
- 3. Malhan, S., Oksuz, E., Babineaux, S. M., et al. Assessment of the direct medical costs of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications in Turkey. (2014) Turk J Endocrinol Metabol18: 39-43.
- 4. Balamurugan, R., Stalin, A., Ignacimuthu, S. Molecular docking of γ-sitosterol with some targets related to diabetes. (2012) Eur J Med Chem 47(1): 38-43.
- 5. Guedes, A.C., Amaro, H.M., Malcata, F.X. Microalgae as sources of high added-value compounds—a brief review of recent work. (2011) Biotechnol Prog 27(3): 597-613.
- 6. Bandura, A. On the Psychosocial Impact and Mechanisms of Spiritual Modelling. (2003) Int J Psychol Relıg 13(3): 167-173.
- 7. Sitachitta, N., Gerwick, W.H. Grenadadiene and grenadamide, cyclopropyl-containing fatty acid metabolites from the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscula. (1998) J Nat Prod 61(5): 681-684.
- 8. Shi, X.M., Jiang, Y., Chen, F. High-yield production of lutein by the green microalgae Chlorella protothecoides in heterotrophic fed-batch culture. (2002) Biotechnol Prog 18(4): 723–727.
- 9. Gardeva, E., Toshkova, R., Minkova, K., et al. Cancer protective action of polysaccharide derived from microalgae Porphyridium cruentum—A biological background. (2009) Biotechnol & Biotechnol Equip 23: 783–787.
- 10. De Jesus Raposo, M.F., De Morais, R.M.S.C., De Morais, A.M.M.B. Bioactivity and applications of sulphated polysaccharides from marine microalgae. (2013) Mar Drugs 11(1): 233-252.
- 11. Udenigwe, C.C., Mohan, A. Mechanisms of food protein-derived antihypertensive peptides other than ACE inhibition. (2014) J Funct Foods 8: 45-52.
- 12. Arora, A., Kumar, N., Agarwal, T. Retraction: Human telomeric G-quadruplex: targeting with small molecules. (2010) FEBS J 277: 1345.
- 13. Selvaraj, G., Kaliamurthi, S., Cakmak, Z. E., et al. Computational screening of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors from microalgal metabolites by pharmacophore modelling and molecular docking. (2016) Physiological Res 64 (4): 291–299.
- 14. Magalhaes, C.S.D., Barbosa, H.J., Dardenne, L.E. A genetic algorithm for the ligand-protein docking problem. (2004) Genet Mol Biol 27(4): 605-610.
- 15. Wallace, A.C., Laskowski, R.A., Thornton, J.M. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. (1995) Prot Eng8 (2): 127-134.
- 16. Mavridis, L., Hudson, B.D., Ritchie, D.W. Toward High Throughput 3D Virtual Screening using Spherical Harmonic Molecular Surface Representations. (2007) J Chem Inf Model 47(5): 1787-1796.
- 17. Ritchie, D.W., Kozakov, D., Vajda, S. Accelerating Protein-Protein Docking Correlations Using a Six-Dimensional Analytic FFT Generating Function. (2008) Bioinform 24(17): 1865-1873.
- 18. Ryckebosch, E., Muylaert, K., Foubert, I. Optimization of an analytical procedure for extraction of lipids from microalgae. (2012) J Am Oil Chem Soc 89(2): 189-198.
- 19. Taouis, M., Dagou, C., Ster, C., et al. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids prevent the defect of insulin receptor signalling in muscle. (2002) Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282(3): E664–671.
- 20. Fowler, M. J. Microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. (2008) Clin Diabetes 26(2): 77-82.
- 21. Zarzycki, M., Kolodziejczyk, R., Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska, E., et al. Structure of E69Q mutant of human muscle fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase. (2011) Acta Cryst D Biol Crystallogr 67: 1028-1034.
- 22. Middha, S. K., Goyal, A. K., Faizan, S. A., et al. In silico–based combinatorial pharmacophore modelling and docking studies of GSK-3β and GK inhibitors of Hippophae. (2013) J Biosci 38(4): 805-814.
- 23. Quezada, C., Alarcón, S., Cárcamo, J. G., et al. Increased expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) in kidney glomeruli of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. (2011) Biol Chem 392(6): 529-537.
- 24. Guengerich, F. P. Cytochrome p450 and chemical toxicology. (2007) Chem Res Toxicol 21(1): 70-83.
- 25. Chen, T.L., Chang, H.C., Chen, T.G., et al. Modulation of cytochrome P-450 dependent monooxygenase in streptozotocin-induced diabetic hamster: I. Effects of propofol on defluorination and cytochrome P-450 activities. (2000) Acta Anaesthesiol Sci 38(1): 15 - 21.
- 26. Maeda, H., Hosokawa, M., Sashima, T., et al. Dietary combination of fucoxanthin and fish oil attenuates the weight gain of white adipose tissue and decreases blood glucose in obese/diabetic KK-Ay mice. (2007) J Agric Food Chem 55(19): 7701–7706.
- 27. Nomura, T., Kikuchi, M., Kubodera, A., et al. Proton-donative antioxidant activity of fucoxanthin with 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). (1997) Biochem Mol Biol Int 42(2): 361-370.
- 28. Liu, C.L., Lim, Y.P., Hu, M.L. Fucoxanthin attenuates rifampin-induced cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and multiple drug resistance 1 (MDR1) gene expression through pregnane X receptor (PXR)-mediated pathways in human hepatoma HepG2 and colon adenocarcinoma LS174T cells. (2012) Mar Drugs 10(1): 242-257.
- 29. Maeda, H., Hosokawa, M., Sashima, T., et al. Fucoxanthin and its metabolite, fucoxanthinol, suppress adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. (2006) Int J Mol Med18 (1): 147-152.
- 30. Hosokawa, M., Kudo, M., Maeda, H., et al. Fucoxanthin induces apoptosis and enhances the anti proliferative effect of the PPARγ ligand, troglitazone, on colon cancer cells. (2004) Biochim Biophys Acta 1675(1-3): 113-119.
- 31. Kohno, H., Yoshitani, S. I., Takashima, S., et al. Troglitazone, a Ligand for Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ Inhibits Chemically-induced Aberrant Crypt Foci in Rats. (2001) Jpn J Cancer Sci 92(4): 396-403.
- 32. Henriksen, E.J., Dokken, B.B. Role of glycogen synthase kinase-3 in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. (2006) Curr Drug Targets 7(11): 1435-1441.
- 33. Nikoulina, S.E., Ciaraldi, T.P., Mudaliar, S., et al. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3 improve s insulin action and glucose metabolism in human skeletal muscle. (2002) Diabetes 51(7): 2190-2198.
- 34. Bone, R.A., Landrum, J. T., Guerra, L. H., et al. Lutein and Zeaxanthin dietary supplements raise macular pigment density and serum concentrations of these carotenoids in humans. (2003) J Nutr 133(4): 992-998.
- 35. Arnal, E., Miranda, M., Johnsen-Soriano, S., et al. Beneficial effect of docosahexanoic acid and lutein on retinal structural, metabolic, and functional abnormalities in diabetic rats. (2009) Curr Eye Res 34(11): 928-938.
- 36. Li, S. Y., Yang, D., Fu, Z. J., et al. Lutein enhances survival and reduces neuronal damage in a mouse model of ischemic stroke. (2012) Neurobiol Dis 45(1): 624-632.
- 37. Dzau, V.J., Antman, E.M., Black, H.R., et al. The cardiovascular disease continuum validated: clinical evidence of improved patient outcomes. Part I: pathophysiology and clinical trial evidence (risk factors through stable coronary artery disease). (2006) Circul114 (25): 2850–2870.
- 38. Jones, J.R., Barrick, C., Kim, K.A., et al. Deletion of PPARΓ in adipose tissues of mice protects against high fat diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. (2005) Proc Nat Acad Sci 102(17): 6207-6212.
- 39. Takaichi, S. Carotenoids in algae: distributions, biosyntheses and functions. (2011) Mar Drugs 9:1101-1118.
- 40. Naguib, Y. M. Antioxidant activities of astaxanthin and related carotenoids. (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48(4): 1150-1154.
- 41. Wang, J. J., Chen, Z.Q., Lu, W.Q. Hypoglycaemic effect of astaxanthin from shrimp waste in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. (2012) Med Chem Res 21(9): 2363-2367.
- 42. Iwasaki, S., Widjaja-Adhi, M.A.K., Koide, A., et al. In Vivo Antioxidant Activity of Fucoxanthin on Obese/Diabetes KK-A y Mice. (2012) Food and Nutr Sci 3(11): 1491-1499.